Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: David De Graff <postgresql(at)awarehouse(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Webmaster <webmaster(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
Date: 2002-10-14 23:01:26
Message-ID: 200210142301.g9EN1QP04319@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat wrote:
> Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.

Yes, this is a huge win, and something for our advocacy site, and for
the main PostgreSQL page too. Vince?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2002-10-14 23:44:44 Re: Let's get 7.3 done
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-14 23:00:15 Re: interesting side effect of autocommit = off