Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From: Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers(at)empires(dot)org>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
Date: 2002-10-15 03:47:05
Message-ID: 200210142047.05035.list-pgsql-hackers@empires.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of
> PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites
> (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
> marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
>
> Robert Treat

Don't worry about Oracle, they don't need real customers. Their database
market consists of a healthy balance of real and fictitious people. See
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/04/17/179252.shtml?tid=98

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-15 04:01:16 Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-15 03:38:55 Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c