From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Denis A Ustimenko <denis(at)oldham(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c |
Date: | 2002-10-14 17:14:22 |
Message-ID: | 200210141714.g9EHEM926154@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > That whole remains structure should be a time_t variable, and then we
> > _know_ we can't assume it is signed. The use of timeval should
> > happen only in pqWaitTimed because it has to use select().
>
> I think it's fine to use struct timeval as the parameter type for
> pqWaitTimed. This particular caller of pqWaitTimed has no need for
> sub-second wait precision, but that doesn't mean we might not want it
> for other purposes later.
That was a question: whether pqWaitTimed() was something exported by
libpq and therefore something that has an API that shouldn't change. I
see it in libpq-int.h, which I think means it isn't exported, but yes,
there could be later cases where we need subsecond stuff.
I have applied the following patch to get us a little closer to sanity.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 4.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-14 17:34:26 | Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-10-14 17:01:32 | Turkish version of the PostgreSQL "Advocacy and Marketing" site is ready |