From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: .cvsignore file |
Date: | 2002-10-11 15:50:02 |
Message-ID: | 20021011155002.GA4177@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:56:14AM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> Why not ignore the set of compiled files as well? I realize its a much
> larger list, but seems a fairly common thing to do. It does prevent the
> overhead with CVS server in the event someone does check against a
> compiled tree.
Yeah, it would also help clean the output of cvs diff, automatically
ignoring files that aren't important. I always have to clean it up...
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"No reniegues de lo que alguna vez creíste"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-10-11 16:07:00 | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-11 15:45:52 | Re: INSTALL updates |