From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup |
Date: | 2002-10-09 00:26:57 |
Message-ID: | 200210090026.g990QvM07007@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2002 at 13:48, Neil Conway wrote:
>
> > "Sandeep Chadha" <sandeep(at)newnetco(dot)com> writes:
> > > Postgresql has been lacking this all along. I've installed postgres
> > > 7.3b2 and still don't see any archive's flushed to any other
> > > place. Please let me know how is hot backup procedure implemented in
> > > current 7.3 beta(2) release.
> > AFAIK no such hot backup feature has been implemented for 7.3 -- you
> > appear to have been misinformed.
>
> Is replication an answer to hot backup?
We already allow hot backups using pg_dump. If you mean point-in-time
recovery, we have a patch for that ready for 7.4.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-09 00:28:12 | Re: deadlock detected |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-09 00:10:04 | Re: firstest doubts... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-10-09 02:19:34 | Italian version of the PostgreSQL "Advocacy and Marketing" site is ready |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-09 00:07:30 | Re: inline newNode() |