From: | Ragnar Kjørstad <postgres(at)ragnark(dot)vestdata(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Miles <chris_pg002(at)psychofx(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and 2-node failover cluster solutions |
Date: | 2002-10-05 22:47:55 |
Message-ID: | 20021006004755.A27763@vestdata.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:05:28PM +0100, Chris Miles wrote:
> Hi, we have 2 PostgreSQL servers running multiple instances and would like
> to automate failover between them. We store db data on NFS storage on
> dedicated Netapps. We can currently perform manual failover by dropping
> the instance on one server and starting in on the other (the init scripts
> handle bringing virtual IP up/down and the NFS volume is automounted as
> needed).
Uh; why would you want to do that?
Databases work much better with local storage than over NFS.
> My question to you: are there any simple, reliable and free cluster/fail-over
> (whatever you'd like to call it) solutions that you know of to automate
> the above? I'm prepared to give a bit on the simple and free if necessary,
> although reliability is pretty important.
http://www.linux-ha.org/ (heartbeat)
> Many other offerings floating around are either expensive commercial, or
> overly complex requiring kernel patching and complicated setups.
What OS?
There are a very large number of linux failover software packages;
commercial and free. They all have their pros and cons - I prefer
heartbeat because of it's simplicity. (the main drawback of heartbeat is
that it does not yet implement service-monitoring - but you can do that
outside heartbeat if you want to)
--
Ragnar Kjørstad
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolaus Dilger | 2002-10-06 03:06:02 | Re: 3 million record updates |
Previous Message | Hubert depesz Lubaczewski | 2002-10-05 08:21:36 | Re: Fast Deletion For Large Tables |