| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: anoncvs and diff |
| Date: | 2002-10-03 15:48:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200210031548.g93FmTT05363@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
>
> I've been waiting to see how a patched file differs from my version.
>
> The patch was added to the to apply list last week I think (it wasn't mine btw)
> and I've been doing cvs diff to view the differences so I can tell when the
> patch has been applied. Additional information given by this is the revision
> number the comparison is against of course. This has stayed at 1.61 all the
> time I've been doing this cvs diff operation. Looking at the web interface to
> cvs I see the file has a revision number of 1.64. I use the anoncvs server for
> my operations. Am I being daft or is there a problem with the anoncvs archive?
That is strange. anoncvs and the web interface should have the same
version number. What file are you looking at?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas O'Connell | 2002-10-03 15:48:31 | Re: Anyone want to assist with the translation of the Advocacy site? |
| Previous Message | Charles H. Woloszynski | 2002-10-03 14:26:59 | Re: Large databases, performance |