Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-02 15:45:40
Message-ID: 200210021545.g92FjeO13986@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner wrote:
> At 09:42 AM 2/10/2002 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
> >Yes, and do the peripheral stuff to support old archives etc.
>
> Does silence mean people agree? Does it also mean someone is doing this
> (eg. whoever did the off_t support)? Or does it mean somebody else needs to
> do it?

Added to open items:

Fix pg_dump to handle 64-bit off_t offsets for custom format

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 1.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mario Weilguni 2002-10-02 16:05:17 small patch for vacuumlo
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-02 15:41:48 Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...