Re: 7.2.3 patching done

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Yury Bokhoncovich <byg(at)center-f1(dot)ru>, Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.2.3 patching done
Date: 2002-10-01 22:10:57
Message-ID: 200210012210.g91MAvD25721@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Adding or removing files isn't the problem (see -N option). Binary files
> >> are the problem.
>
> > Do we change any binary files in minor releases, or even major ones?
>
> But the source distribution hasn't *got* any binary files.

Yea, that was sort of my point.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2002-10-01 23:42:16 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-01 21:24:50 Purpose of rscale/dscale in NUMERIC?