From: | "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to REINDEX in high volume environments? |
Date: | 2002-09-30 13:24:28 |
Message-ID: | 200209301324.g8UDOSX05475@server3.spectrumtelecorp.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Just wanted to pipe in here. I am still very interested in tablespaces ( I have many database systems that are over
500GB and growing) and am willing to port my tablespace patch to 7.4. I have everything (but only tested here) working
in 7.2 but the patch was not accepted. I didn't see a great speed improvement but the patch helps with storage management.
Recap. the patch would enable the following
a database to have a default data tablespace and index tablespace
a user to have a default data and index tablespace
a table to have a specific tablespace
an index to have a specfic tablespace
I would like to also add namespace (schema) to have a default data and index tablespaces
Jim
> Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> >> Looks like we should have a subdirectory in database directory which stores
> >> index.
>
> > That was my first thought also, but an alternative/additional approach
> > would be this (not sure if it's workable):
>
> See the tablespaces TODO item. I'm not excited about building
> half-baked versions of tablespaces before we get around to doing the
> real thing ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2002-09-30 13:57:33 | Re: [SQL] arrays |
Previous Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2002-09-30 13:18:54 | Re: [SQL] arrays |