Re: Upgrade process (was Re: 7.2.3?)

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upgrade process (was Re: 7.2.3?)
Date: 2002-09-28 21:05:58
Message-ID: 200209281705.58316.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday 28 September 2002 04:57 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> 7.3 we've changed tuple headers for space-saving reasons, and fixed
> some problems with alignment in array data.

> Going forward I think we should try to maintain compatibility of on-disk
> user data and ensure that pg_upgrade works.

This is of course a two-edged sword.

1.) Keeping pg_upgrade working, which depends upon pg_dump working;
2.) Maintaining security fixes for 7.2 for a good period of time to come,
since migration from 7.2 to >7.2 isn't easy.

If pg_upgrade is going to be the cookie, then let's all try to test the
cookie. I'll certainly try to do my part.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-28 21:22:02 Re: Upgrade process (was Re: 7.2.3?)
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2002-09-28 21:00:31 Re: 7.2.3?