Re: additional patch for contrib/tablefunc - added to

Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> >>I think you finally got through my thick skull. Now I see the
> >>issue. OK, I'll rework the patch using a timeout.
> >
> > I think this is unnecessary. Bugs in any functionality tested by a
> > regression test could cause the system to go into an infinite loop;
> > but we don't put timeouts on all of them. In practice we rely on
> > the user to exercise some judgment about whether the tests are
> > proceeding normally.
>
> Sounds good to me. I guess the patch stands as originally sent, unless other
> objections arise.

Uh, I already deleted it. Can you shoot it to me again? :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073