From: | Scott Chapman <scott_list(at)mischko(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SQL subquery to supply table name? |
Date: | 2002-09-27 02:40:37 |
Message-ID: | 200209261940.37792.scott_list@mischko.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I was lead to believe that Postgresql would handle this from reading the docs.
This error message from psql made me think it would also:
select txtcompanyname from (select table_quest from reviews where
review_num=28) where review_num=28;
ERROR: sub-SELECT in FROM must have an alias
For example, FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] foo
What is the "sub-SELECT in FROM" supposed to be used for if not this usage?
Scott
On Thursday 26 September 2002 06:01 pm, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> I think the basic response is "don't do that". SQL doesn't support queries
> where the tables are not predetermined. The query planner would have a
> terrible time since it would not be able to estimate costs prior to
> execution.
>
> Since all your "subtables" are likely to have the same structure, why not
> store them all in one table. Any particular reason?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-27 02:44:33 | Re: Unixtime (epoch) into timestamp? |
Previous Message | Scott Chapman | 2002-09-27 02:33:08 | Re: SQL subquery to supply table name? |