Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Date: 2002-09-26 05:16:12
Message-ID: 200209260516.g8Q5GCx04205@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > ... Now, we just have the GUC value which does
> > propogate like the global one did. Does the postmaster still pass -dX
> > down to the child like it used to?
>
> Evidently not; else Patrick wouldn't be complaining that it doesn't
> work like it used to.

OK, got it. I knew server_min_messages would propogate to the client,
but that doesn't trigger the -d special cases in postgres.c. I re-added
the -d flag propogation to the postmaster. I also changed the postgres
-d0 behavior to just reset server_min_messages rather than setting it to
'notice.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 2.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2002-09-26 08:07:15 Re: rotatelog / logrotate with PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-26 04:00:10 Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-26 05:23:06 Re: Memory Errors...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-26 04:40:55 SSL code fixed