Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Date: 2002-09-26 04:02:49
Message-ID: 200209260402.g8Q42nO16999@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, I am back. I think the most promising proposal was from you, Tom:
> > http://candle.pha.pa.us/mhonarc/todo.detail/return/msg00012.html
>
> But that wasn't a specific proposal --- it was more or less an
> enumeration of the possibilities. What are we picking?

The rest of my message explains your poposal while clarifying certain
options you gave in the email.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-26 04:40:55 SSL code fixed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-26 04:02:29 Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel