| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? |
| Date: | 2002-09-25 22:29:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200209252229.g8PMThL04601@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I already have a TODO item:
> > * Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]
> > I am unsure if it will be fixed in 7.3 or not. It is still on the open
> > items list, and I think we have a general plan to fix it.
>
> I got distracted and wasn't following the thread a few days ago about
> the topic. Did people come to a consensus about how it should work?
Well, sort of. It was similar to your original proposal. See the TODO
link for details. I am heading out for 2 hours and will summarize when
I return.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-25 22:35:29 | postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist) |
| Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2002-09-25 22:28:21 | Re: Relation 0 does not exist |