Re: cascade problems

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Michael Zouroudis <mzouroudis(at)idealcorp(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cascade problems
Date: 2002-09-19 17:54:49
Message-ID: 20020919105241.R29049-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Michael Zouroudis wrote:

> for those who can help,
>
> on my database i have two tables, organization and transaction, listed here;
> -------------------------------------
> create table organization(
> organ_person_id serial primary key,
> asset_id int,
> fname text,
> lname text,
> phone varchar(15),
> email varchar(20),
> constraint organization_asset_id_fk foreign key(asset_id) references
> assets(asset_id));
>
> create table transaction(
> transaction_id serial primary key,
> trans_date timestamp default current_timestamp,
> return_date timestamp,
> organ_person_id int,
> constraint transaction_organ_person_id_fk foreign key(organ_person_id)
> references organization(organ_person_id) on delete cascade );
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> what i want is for a delete on transaction to make a delete on
> organization where the organ_person_id s match up,with a query like;
>
> *delete from transaction where organ_person_id = 15;*
>
> but this is not happening. all it does is delete from transaction, and
> doesn't touch organization. am i doing something wrong?

The ON [DELETE|UPDATE] <action> clauses refer to the referenced table
not the referencing table. The constraint says that if you delete
an organization the transactions associated with that organization
should be removed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Luc Lachance 2002-09-19 17:57:14 Re: IN vs EXIIST
Previous Message Darren Ferguson 2002-09-19 17:52:21 Re: IN vs EXIIST