Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Date: 2002-09-19 12:27:47
Message-ID: 20020919092656.K53125-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > It is an open issue. It has to be resolved. When it is, I will remove
> > > it. I added a question mark to it but it needs to be tracked. I keep
> > > having to add and remove it because I have people telling me what to do.
> > >
> > > It was Peter who told me to add it, and you and Thomas to remove it. It
> > > isn't me adding/removing on my own.
> >
> > Right, so you have two telling you to remove it, one telling you to add
> > it, and two that are discussion why/if it *should* be added ... Tom feels
> > it should be added, and I'm clarifing the why of it ... don't re-add it
> > until we've determined *if* it is actually an open issue or not ... stop
> > jumping the gun ...
>
> I will make the decision. If you want to maintain your own open items
> list, go ahead.

Ah, okay, so your list doesn't necessarily follow reality, its more for
your own use ... k, as long as we have that clarified, we're fine ...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-19 13:22:45 Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Previous Message Louis-David Mitterrand 2002-09-19 12:07:15 Re: generating postgres core files on debian