From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items) |
Date: | 2002-09-19 12:27:47 |
Message-ID: | 20020919092656.K53125-100000@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > It is an open issue. It has to be resolved. When it is, I will remove
> > > it. I added a question mark to it but it needs to be tracked. I keep
> > > having to add and remove it because I have people telling me what to do.
> > >
> > > It was Peter who told me to add it, and you and Thomas to remove it. It
> > > isn't me adding/removing on my own.
> >
> > Right, so you have two telling you to remove it, one telling you to add
> > it, and two that are discussion why/if it *should* be added ... Tom feels
> > it should be added, and I'm clarifing the why of it ... don't re-add it
> > until we've determined *if* it is actually an open issue or not ... stop
> > jumping the gun ...
>
> I will make the decision. If you want to maintain your own open items
> list, go ahead.
Ah, okay, so your list doesn't necessarily follow reality, its more for
your own use ... k, as long as we have that clarified, we're fine ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-19 13:22:45 | Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items) |
Previous Message | Louis-David Mitterrand | 2002-09-19 12:07:15 | Re: generating postgres core files on debian |