Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Date: 2002-09-19 02:34:32
Message-ID: 200209190234.g8J2YWg29662@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I think you are confusing the open items list with the TODO list. TODO
> > usually has some basis, while open items is just that, things we need to
> > decide on. Peter brought it up and wanted it on the list so I put it
> > on. I can be taken off just as easily. I put Peter's name on the item,
> > and a question mark. The open items list is just so we don't forget
> > things.
>
> I'm in agreement with Thomas here ... unless a problem has been defined a
> bit more specifically then 'it isn't posix compliant', it shouldn't be
> considered an open item ... please remove?

Removed. See, I can remove them as quickly as I add them. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-09-19 02:42:14 Re: BLOB
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-19 02:34:08 Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)