| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rajesh Kumar Mallah(dot)" <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Index usage on date feild , differences in '>' and '>=' |
| Date: | 2002-09-19 06:37:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20020918233621.A23870-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote:
> I am trying to improve a query to use existing indexes but facing diffculty.
>
>
> Looks like 'between' amd '>=' are not using indexes althoug > and < does.
> all my application code uses between and i am sure it use to work fine
> at one point of time.
>
>
> regds
> mallah.
>
> SQL TRANSCRIPT:
> ======================================================================================
>
> tradein_clients=> explain select list_id from eyp_rfi a where generated > '2002-08-13' and generated < '2002-09-19' ;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Index Scan using eyp_rfi_date on eyp_rfi a (cost=0.00..15796.97 rows=4150 width=4)
>
> EXPLAIN
> tradein_clients=> explain select list_id from eyp_rfi a where generated >= '2002-08-13' and generated < '2002-09-19' ;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Seq Scan on eyp_rfi a (cost=0.00..17923.81 rows=5061 width=4)
Given how close the two results are (and the fact that they differ by 900
rows), have you tried using set enable_seqscan=off and seeing what
explain gives you for the second query? My guess is that it'll have
an estimated cost greater than the 17923.81 it's estimating from the
sequence scan.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah. | 2002-09-19 06:38:46 | Index usage on date feild , differences in '>' and '>=' and between |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-09-18 21:58:56 | Re: Performance w/ multiple WHERE clauses |