| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues |
| Date: | 2002-09-18 21:13:26 |
| Message-ID: | 200209182113.g8ILDQ501926@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > Or possibly it should be AS IMPLICIT?
> >
> > I think AS IMPLICIT would be better because we have other AS [var]
> > clauses.
>
> But IMPLICIT is not a variable.
I meant we have cases where we do AS [ keyword1 | keyword2 ].
CREATE OPERATOR CLASS any_name opt_default FOR TYPE_P Typename
USING access_method AS opclass_item_list
What I am saying is that is better to do AS [ keyword | keyword ] rather
than [ AS keyword | keyword ].
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-18 21:37:50 | Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-18 20:54:25 | Re: please apply patch to contrib/ltree |