| From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cindy <ctmoore(at)uci(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: to_number function questions |
| Date: | 2002-09-18 08:14:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20020918101417.A11154@zf.jcu.cz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:26:57PM -0700, Cindy wrote:
>
> What does to_number do with a string like "123x78" ? Does
> it try to convert the whole string? Does it stop at x, giving 123?
> Does it drop x? Does it return some sort of failure?
test=# select to_number('123x78', '999x99');
to_number
-----------
12378
test=# select to_number('123x78', '999');
to_number
-----------
123
test=# select to_number('123x78', '999999');
to_number
-----------
12378
test=# select to_number('123xxx78', '999yyy99');
to_number
-----------
12378
> Also, suppose that you give to_number 123, and the second parameter is
> "999999" ? Do the extra 9's give any problem (you dn't always know
> whether to_number will get 0-99999, so what do you give it in the
> formatting string? If it has more 9's in the format string than are
> digits in the number, will it pad it?
test=# select to_number('123', '99999999999999999999999');
to_number
-----------
123
> Sorry for all the q's but the page
> http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?functions-formatting.html
> only lists things in tables and does not discuss the sorts of questions
> or oddball inputs/exceptions I ask about.
The docs expect that user knows 'psql' and knows method how test wanted
questions before post it to PG lists :-) The patches with better docs are
wanted of course.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | GB Clark | 2002-09-18 08:27:06 | Re: general trouble installing languages |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-18 04:57:09 | Re: [HACKERS] PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |