Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-17 22:36:37
Message-ID: 200209172236.g8HMaci29555@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Rod Taylor wrote:
> I forget, is it possible to make a GUC that cannot be changed during
> runtime?

Yes, you can set it to it only can be changed by the super-user and only
takes effect on restart.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2002-09-17 23:24:48 Re: find overlapping address ranges
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-09-17 22:34:08 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-09-18 01:17:47 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.3: help on new CREATE TYPE
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-09-17 22:34:08 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?