Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues
Date: 2002-09-17 06:05:39
Message-ID: 200209170605.g8H65eZ02461@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> We've been discussing this stuff in fits and starts for months now, but
> nothing satisfactory has been arrived at. I've concluded that part of
> the problem is that we are trying to force the system's behavior into
> a model that is too limiting: we need more than an implicit/explicit cast
> distinction. Accordingly, I suggest we bite the bullet and make it happen.
> (Note that I've resigned myself to having to do an initdb for 7.3beta2.)

I was reading my backlog of email and thinking, "Oh, things are shaping
up well", then I hit this message. Let me try to collect open items
tomorrow and get a plan together. I have caught up on my email. I am
heading to bed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-17 06:30:05 Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-17 05:36:11 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?