| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Harding <ianh(at)tpchd(dot)org> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RI Trigger Names |
| Date: | 2002-09-16 15:42:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20020916084110.L89802-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Ian Harding wrote:
> I am wondering if there is a TODO to make the names for RI constraints
> incorporate the name of the constraint they implement to make it
> easier for humans to see what is going on. Something like
>
> RI_myconstraintname_Trigger
>
> instead of
>
> RI_ConstraintTrigger_111633344.
>
> I looked in the TODO list and only found these:
>
> -Make foreign key constraints clearer in dump file
> -Make other constraints clearer in dump file
Not specifically, but it might be a good idea to do for 7.4
since it'll also give you some limited control over the firing
order of multiple fk constraints on the same table.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2002-09-16 15:43:06 | Re: OID order = INSERT order? |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-09-16 15:27:23 | Re: database connectivty problem! |