From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Hanno Wiegard <hwiegard(at)web(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Table alias in DELETE statements |
Date: | 2002-09-14 06:07:46 |
Message-ID: | 20020914140726.Y14554-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On the several occasions I've tried using table aliases in delete
statements, it hasn't worked.
Chris
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Hanno Wiegard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've already checked the mailing archive but found nothing about
> problems with the DELETE statement and table alias but it's not
> mentioned in the docs. So the question for me is whether it is possible
> to use a table alias in a DELETE statement or not, e.g.
> DELETE FROM foo f WHERE f.ID > 3000 (more complicated cases in reality
> and I really need the alias because the SQL is generated automaically
> by a tool)?
>
> Thanks,
> Hanno Wiegard
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Die clevere Geldreserve: der DiBa-Privatkredit. Funktioniert wie ein Dispo,
> ist aber viel gunstiger! Alle Infos: http://diba.web.de/?mc=021104
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-14 15:03:29 | Re: sql group by statement |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-14 03:35:03 | Re: Timestamp Fractions Problem |