From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Assignments in PL/pgSQL |
Date: | 2002-09-13 17:51:41 |
Message-ID: | 200209131051.41556.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Michael,
> although this is not really SQL, but PL/pgSQL, I hope this is the right
> place to ask.
This is the right place.
> I have written a complex triggers. It works very well. Just now I have
> realized that I have used the = operater for variable assignments, instead
> of the := operater. To my suprise, there was no error or warning, and the
> store procedure works very well!
>
> e.g.
> NEW.someval = rec.someother;
> works as well as
> NEW.someval := rec.someother;
>
> Can you confirm that both are valid? Can someone explain this?
> And is it safe to use the former syntax?
I'm very surprised, too. The "=" syntax is not per spec; my guess is,
somebody coded in compatibility for DB conversion purposes and left it there.
Jan? Tom?
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-09-13 18:04:35 | Re: Assignments in PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | Andrew Perrin | 2002-09-13 15:45:10 | Re: LIMIT within UNION? |