From: | Chris Gamache <cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL+ (Beta) and Active Server Pages with @TRANSACTION=REQUIRED |
Date: | 2002-09-12 16:44:41 |
Message-ID: | 20020912164441.96976.qmail@web13804.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Perhaps, but the MS Access ODBC Driver would run in an MTS transaction, even
though there is no transaction support in access.
I use ODBC like I drive my car. I put in the key, turn it, and it just works.
What could I do to get under the hood and find out what this mysterious "Set"
thing might require to function properly?
I don't care to even have the PostgreSQL transaction auto-roll-back when the
MTS Transaction fails. I need the transaction support for the larger operation
of which the database transactions are a small part.
CG
--- Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> Maybe MTS requires Distributed transaction support but
> PostgreSQL(and of cource psqlodbc driver) doesn't support it.
> I'm not sure if MTS provides the option to work with non-
> distributed system.
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Inoue
> http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | robin | 2002-09-13 06:21:40 | how to write odbc sql in visual c++6.0 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-09-12 10:27:45 | Re: [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question |