| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Please rename split(text,text,int) to splitpart |
| Date: | 2002-09-11 04:00:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200209110400.g8B40P411350@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > What do people think if this change?
>
> I'm not thrilled about renaming the function without forcing an initdb
> ... but the alternatives seem worse. Okay by me if we do it.
I am not either. How do you do the documentation when the function can
be called two ways. I guess we can give the SQL query to fix it during
beta2 _and_ add a regression test to make sure it is fix. That sounds
like a plan.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-11 04:01:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Please rename split(text,text,int) to splitpart |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-11 03:56:53 | Re: Please rename split(text,text,int) to splitpart |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-11 04:01:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Please rename split(text,text,int) to splitpart |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-11 03:56:53 | Re: Please rename split(text,text,int) to splitpart |