Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Jore <josh(at)greentechnologist(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
Date: 2002-09-10 17:21:11
Message-ID: 200209101721.g8AHLBg29786@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Jore <josh(at)greentechnologist(dot)org> writes:
> > So I've finished reading Jeffery Friedl's _Mastering Regular Expressions_
> > and while I don't need regex in PostgreSQL I know I'll do it for something
> > - eventually. The book makes a distinction between DFA, POSIX NFA and
> > Traditional NFA and then ascribes some properties and behaviours to each.
> > So what sort does PostgreSQL have?
>
> Well, you could read the code (src/backend/regex), or you could apply
> the tests that Friedl suggests to distinguish the type of an unknown
> engine ...
>
> My guess is that it's an NFA, but I dunno if Spencer did the POSIX
> semantics or not.

I am continuing to talk to Henry about getting a newer version of his
regex library. He is working on it but is not yet finished.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Johnson, Shaunn 2002-09-10 17:24:42 parsing column info
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-09-10 16:34:08 Re: ???Varchar()