Re: 7.3beta and ecpg

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.3beta and ecpg
Date: 2002-09-10 02:17:22
Message-ID: 200209100217.g8A2HMm03881@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > I didn't download the beta but compared the CVS checkouts and it appears
> > the ecpg directory is still the one from 7.2 not the one tagged
> > big_bison. Will this one be moved into the mainstream source?
>
> Well, I think we can't do that until postgresql.org has a version of
> bison installed that will compile it. And I'm really hesitant to see us
> depending on a beta version of bison. Any word on a new bison official
> release?
>
> We still have a few weeks until the situation gets critical, but maybe
> it is time to start thinking about a fallback plan...

IMHO, our fallback is to ship based on the bison beta.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2002-09-10 02:18:07 Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-09-10 02:16:47 Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc