From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Johnson <chris(at)sebis(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: question about WAL. |
Date: | 2002-09-10 01:47:48 |
Message-ID: | 200209100147.g8A1lmf00902@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I understand. We will have point-in-time recovery in 7.4, which will be
perhaps 9 months away.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Johnson wrote:
> hi group,
> I've been told to investigate a real-time "transaction logging" for
> our website's database, currently running postgresql 7.1. It seems to
> me that the WAL feature is what the boss is referring to but the
> documentation only covers the basics (the recovery section doesn't
> exist). I see from archives on google groups that recovery is not
> implemented yet (as of april). I was wondering if current versions fully
> supported WAL or if it's still under development? Or if there is another
> approach to get an up-to-the-current log of transactions for backup and
> recovery purposes? I'm currently using 'pg_dumpall' to get a backup
> nightly but we would like a more up to date option in case of a crash. I
> appologize if this is the wrong group of if this question is asked daily.
>
> thanks to all,
> chrisj
>
> ps. please mail me directly as I'm not on the group yet
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-09-10 03:44:02 | pgsql-performance mailing list / newsgroup created |
Previous Message | Sean Chittenden | 2002-09-10 00:33:18 | Re: fsync or fdatasync |