From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | nickf(at)ontko(dot)com |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ray Ontko <rayo(at)ontko(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Script to compute random page cost |
Date: | 2002-09-10 01:24:28 |
Message-ID: | 200209100124.g8A1OSJ27459@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nick Fankhauser wrote:
> Hi again-
>
> I bounced these numbers off of Ray Ontko here at our shop, and he pointed
> out that random page cost is measured in multiples of a sequential page
> fetch. It seems almost impossible that a random fetch would be less
> expensive than a sequential fetch, yet we all seem to be getting results <
> 1. I can't see anything obviously wrong with the script, but something very
> odd is going.
OK, new version at:
ftp://candle.pha.pa.us/pub/postgresql/randcost
What I have done is to take all of the computation stuff out of the
timed loop so only the 'dd' is done in the loop.
I am getting a 1.0 for random pages cost with this new code, but I don't
have much data in the database so it is very possible I have it all
cached. Would others please test it?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | snpe | 2002-09-10 02:08:01 | Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc |
Previous Message | snpe | 2002-09-10 01:05:21 | Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc |