| From: | Dmitry Morozovsky <marck(at)rinet(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: fsync or fdatasync |
| Date: | 2002-09-09 16:07:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20020909200556.R53739-100000@woozle.rinet.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
GM> apparently the default value for wal_sync_method is fsync,
GM> and apparently the best method is fdatasync.
GM> There is any special consideration for not use the fdatasync
GM> as default ?
#wal_sync_method = fsync # the default varies across platforms:
# # fsync, fdatasync, open_sync, or open_datasync
I suppose fdatasync *is* the default on platforms where it exists. On
*BSD it does not.
Sincerely,
D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck(at)rinet(dot)ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-09-09 16:30:25 | Re: fsync or fdatasync |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-09-09 15:35:12 | Re: fsync or fdatasync |