| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple |
| Date: | 2002-09-09 03:33:49 |
| Message-ID: | 200209090333.g893Xn424337@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Steve Howe wrote:
> We still have to hear the other developers about this, but for a
> while, my votes go to Proposal's #2 (by Tom) and Proposal #3 if enough
> people consider it important.
I think Tom and Hirosh were the people most involved in the previous
discussion.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-09 03:36:38 | Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple count |
| Previous Message | Steve Howe | 2002-09-09 03:32:26 | Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]" issue |