Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple
Date: 2002-09-09 03:22:26
Message-ID: 200209090322.g893MQ921091@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Steve Howe wrote:
> JC> return OID if sum of all replacement INSERTs in the rule inserted
> JC> only one row, else zero
> I don't agree with this one since it would lead us to a meaningless
> information... what would be the number retrieved ? Not an OID, nor
> nothing.

I don't understand this objection.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Howe 2002-09-09 03:27:47 Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple count
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-09 03:21:11 Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple