Re: Future of --enable-recode?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Future of --enable-recode?
Date: 2002-09-04 22:09:47
Message-ID: 200209042209.g84M9l104657@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Now that the "multibyte"-based character set recoding is a fixed part of
> > the feature set, is there any need to keep the "Cyrillic" recode support?
>
> It's probably not worth maintaining anymore ...

Added to TODO:

> * Remove Cyrillic recode support

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-04 22:16:00 Re: Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE....
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-04 22:05:40 Re: fix for palloc() of user-supplied length