| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: indisclustered and clusterdb |
| Date: | 2002-09-03 01:27:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200209030127.g831RtE10179@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Added to open items. I wonder if vacuumdb and reindexdb are OK?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, clusterdb is not schema-aware and will surely fail in any database
> where more than one schema is in use, because it doesn't trouble to
> schema-qualify table names.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-03 01:56:23 | Re: indisclustered and clusterdb |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-03 01:14:01 | Re: indisclustered and clusterdb |