Re: rules regression test fix

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rules regression test fix
Date: 2002-09-02 04:28:19
Message-ID: 200209020428.g824SJK28382@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://207.106.42.251/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Neil Conway wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane dijo:
> > > Do we have any concurrent tests that create/drop views, or tables with
> > > rules on them?
> >
> > Yes, alter_table.
>
> Okay, attached is a patch that moves the alter table regression test
> into a separate parallel group. I can't confirm that this fixes the
> problem for me (since it only occurs about one in ten or one in twenty
> runs), but I think it's a good bet that it does...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-02 04:37:10 Re: Minor regression test fix
Previous Message Barry Lind 2002-09-02 03:14:51 Re: [PATCHES] JDBC timestamp does not understand [-]infinity