| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: tweaking MemSet() performance |
| Date: | 2002-08-29 23:53:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20020829195350.5b9b0683.alvherre@atentus.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
En Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:35:13 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> escribió:
> In your results it seems to suggest that memset() gets slower for longer
> buffer lengths, and a for loop starts to win at longer sizes. Should I
> pull out my Solaris kernel source and see what memset() is doing?
No, because memset() belongs to the libc AFAICS... Do you have source
code for that?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"Pensar que el espectro que vemos es ilusorio no lo despoja de espanto,
sólo le suma el nuevo terror de la locura" (Perelandra, CSLewis)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2002-08-29 23:56:20 | Re: tweaking MemSet() performance |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-29 23:48:54 | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about memory management |