Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, ghum(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to
Date: 2002-08-29 22:23:32
Message-ID: 20020829182332.363df607.alvherre@atentus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

En Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:14:20 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> escribió:

> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > How do people like the idea of grouping them? I would do it in psql \?
> > and in the psql manual page.
>
> Seems reasonable, but then we should also have something along the lines
> of
>
> \? \r
>
> so I don't have to dig through the whole pile if I'm interested in a
> particular command. (cf. \help behavior)

That'd be neat. Also you can include some meta-items that allow the
display of a single group with more detail.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"Nunca se desea ardientemente lo que solo se desea por razon" (F. Alexandre)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-29 23:05:49 Re: @(#)Mordre Labs advisory 0x0005: Several buffer overruns
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-08-29 22:15:11 Re: VIRUS IN YOUR MAIL (W32/Klez.h@MM)