| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1? |
| Date: | 2002-08-29 15:16:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200208291516.g7TFGKQ07819@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I'd like to see the old COPY syntax still documented, but in the
> same way --- it need not be in the synopsis, just somewhere where people
> can see it without having to refer back to old manuals.
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2002-08-29 16:09:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed GUC Variable |
| Previous Message | Paul Cowan | 2002-08-29 13:53:12 | ms word 2002 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Patnude | 2002-08-29 15:35:42 | Why must the function that a trigger calls return "opaque" ??? |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2002-08-29 13:41:29 | Re: signed/unsigned integers |