| From: | Magnus Enbom <dot(at)rockstorm(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1? |
| Date: | 2002-08-28 08:28:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20020828102841.A23539@ford.rockstorm.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:45:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, patch attached. It was actually easier than I thought. We have to
> decide if we are going to remove the old syntax in 7.4.
>
> Regression tests pass. No doc updates yet.
Thanks alot! I don't mind keeping the old syntax.
-- M
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-08-28 08:41:27 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_attribute.attisinherited ? |
| Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2002-08-28 08:05:21 | Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ivan Jordanov | 2002-08-28 11:27:09 | Can I use "UPDATE" sql statement in trigger before or after update ? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-28 08:15:22 | Re: signed/unsigned integers |