Re: improve SET CONSTRAINTS

Patch applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Neil Conway wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Also, don't we run the trigger queue after each statement anyway? So why
> > does it need to be run by SET CONSTRAINTS explicitly?
>
> I've been pulling my hair out regarding this since Stephen pointed it
> out earlier on -patches. Although I could have *sworn* I had a
> test-case in which we did the wrong thing, I can't seem to find one
> now :-)
>
> Sorry for the spam -- AFAICT we did the right thing originally. I've
> attached a revised patch that just includes the documentation
> improvements, code cleanup, and regression tests.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073