From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 issues |
Date: | 2002-08-16 19:58:27 |
Message-ID: | 200208161958.g7GJwRc05480@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >>Since PL/pgSQL is a loadable module still, we might be able to provide
> >>an upgrade after 7.3 is out instead of waiting for 7.4.
> >
> >
> > Maybe, but you'd have to get the core-code end of it in before beta.
> > AFAIR Joe's patch doesn't yet cover any return style from a function
> > except one-row-at-a-time.
> >
>
> Neil said he was working on this and expected to have it done for 7.3. I
> think he's using the approach we discussed at OSCON, namely generating a
> tuplestore within the plpgsql module and passing it back to FunctionNext.
If I understand correctly, it is a great idea because it uses the cursor
return support already in pl/pgsql to handle it. Great idea.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-16 20:22:55 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-16 19:55:24 | Re: Open 7.3 issues |