Re: Open 7.3 issues

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 issues
Date: 2002-08-16 19:58:27
Message-ID: 200208161958.g7GJwRc05480@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >>Since PL/pgSQL is a loadable module still, we might be able to provide
> >>an upgrade after 7.3 is out instead of waiting for 7.4.
> >
> >
> > Maybe, but you'd have to get the core-code end of it in before beta.
> > AFAIR Joe's patch doesn't yet cover any return style from a function
> > except one-row-at-a-time.
> >
>
> Neil said he was working on this and expected to have it done for 7.3. I
> think he's using the approach we discussed at OSCON, namely generating a
> tuplestore within the plpgsql module and passing it back to FunctionNext.

If I understand correctly, it is a great idea because it uses the cursor
return support already in pl/pgsql to handle it. Great idea.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-16 20:22:55 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE()
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-08-16 19:55:24 Re: Open 7.3 issues