From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
Date: | 2002-08-15 16:41:10 |
Message-ID: | 200208151641.g7FGfAN03914@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > OK, no one complained/commented on my idea of having global users have a
> > > > trailing '@', so here is a patch that implements that. It has the
> > > > advantages of:
> > >
> > > Probably because not everyone saw it. I know I didn't. This entire
> > > issue is growing more and more complex. How about a configure item
> > > to not even compile it in? Or better yet, a configure item to put
> > > it there with the default off.
> >
> > I think I am prety close, and I don't see a configure flag as any better
> > than a GUC option that is off by default.
>
> But how many people would even use it? I can't see adding the bloat
> unnecessarily and risking it accidently being turned on. Am I wrong
> and really alot of people actually want/need this?
Well, the demand seems to be larger than I thought, considering the
number of people who have chimed in and want certain features, like
multiple global users. I see this being using more by ISP's and
universities that need better user/db partitioning.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-08-15 16:50:58 | Re: Open 7.3 items |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-08-15 16:38:45 | Re: Open 7.3 items |