From: | Andre Schubert <andre(at)km3(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "Masaru Sugawara" <rk73(at)sea(dot)plala(dot)or(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Need Help for select |
Date: | 2002-08-14 14:04:21 |
Message-ID: | 20020814160421.2c75727e.andre@km3.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:57:02 +0900
"Masaru Sugawara" <rk73(at)sea(dot)plala(dot)or(dot)jp> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:10:53 +0200
> Andre Schubert <andre(at)km3(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > The ride side as follows.
> > Table d contains information about subitems.
> > Table c holds information about subitems and items of type bar.
> > Each subitem can have 0..n items bar selected.
> >
> > What i want is that a subitem is only activated for a foo item if
> > the foo-item has exactly selected the same bar items selected as
> > as the relation between table c and d.
> >
> > Example 1:
> > The foo-item A_Name1 has selected the bar-items 1 and 2.
> > The subitem D_Name1 is only activated for a foo-item if that foo-item
> > has selected the bar-items 1 and 2, this happens for A_Name1.
> >
>
>
> If this mention implies that the tuple of (1, 1) in the c is supposed
> to take precedence over that of (2, 1),
I want to compare if a tuple in c exist in b for each c.d_id and b.a_id.
In c exists 3 tuples: (1,2), (3,4), (5)
and want to find these tuples in b.
select a.name,d.name from a,b,c,d where "tuple found in b" = "tuple found in c" and b.a_id = a.id and c.d_id = d.id
My english is not so good, but i hope you understand what i want to do.
Thanks in advance
>
>
> SELECT a.name, d.name
> FROM (SELECT DISTINCT min(b.a_id) AS a_id, c.d_id
> FROM b, c
> WHERE b.c_id = c.b_id
> GROUP BY b.c_id, c.d_id
> ) AS t,
> a,
> d
> WHERE a.id = t.a_id
> AND d.id = t.d_id
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Masaru Sugawara
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wei Weng | 2002-08-14 14:20:26 | Re: concurrent connections is worse than serialization? |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2002-08-14 13:34:16 | Re: Few Queries |