| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jon Swinth <jswinth(at)atomicpc(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Read Lock For Foreign Key |
| Date: | 2002-08-13 21:17:31 |
| Message-ID: | 200208132117.g7DLHVR20552@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jon Swinth <jswinth(at)atomicpc(dot)com> writes:
> > How come having foreign keys take out a read lock on a parent row
> > rather than a write lock is not on the todo list?
>
> It is, although I agree that the language is something other than plain
> English:
>
> * Implement dirty reads and use them in RI triggers
I was wondering if that is what they were discussing.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Swinth | 2002-08-13 21:21:50 | Re: Read Lock For Foreign Key |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-13 21:15:00 | Re: Read Lock For Foreign Key |