Re: Everything is now "required by the database system"

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Everything is now "required by the database system"
Date: 2002-08-13 17:22:44
Message-ID: 200208131722.g7DHMiX12557@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> With the new dependency system we have the entire system catalog content
> pinned down and unchangeable. This is a tiny dent in the nice extensible
> nature of the system.
>
> Would it be feasible to identify the non-essential parts of the built-in
> objects (say, inet type, numeric type, associated functions, etc.) and
> declare those with regular SQL commands in initdb? In the end, the system
> catalog contents in include/catalog/ would only contain the "bootstrap"
> content. For example, the pg_proc content could be made more manageable
> that way.
>
> Not sure if this is worth considering for this release, but it might be a
> medium-term project.

Uh, some tools rely on those oids being fixed values, don't they? For
example, I see ecpg using NUMERICOID.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-13 17:23:53 Re: libpqxx
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2002-08-13 17:21:25 Re: db partial dumping with pg_dump