From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/tcop/postgres.cbacke |
Date: | 2002-08-13 04:30:12 |
Message-ID: | 200208130430.g7D4UCo27200@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, seeing as no one voted, and only Tom and I objected originally, we
> > will keep the code as Thomas has applied it, namely that PGXLOG/-X is
> > recognized by initdb, postmaster, postgres, and pg_ctl.
>
> We will? It looks to me like Thomas lost the vote 2-to-1.
>
> Unless there are more votes, I'm going to *insist* that this code be
> changed. It's dangerous and offers no offsetting benefit. XLOG
> location should be settable at initdb, noplace later.
Well, you didn't vote again in my follow up email, so I thought you
didn't care anymore, and Thomas didn't reply to my email either. I am
clearly concerned, as you are, but Thomas isn't, and no one else seems
to care.
Can two guys override another guy if he is doing the work? I usually
like to have a larger margin than that. I don't know what to do.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian - CVS | 2002-08-13 04:32:28 | pgsql-server/doc TODO |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-13 04:27:19 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/ref/cluster.sgml rc/ ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-08-13 05:12:04 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/tcop/postgres.cbacke |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-08-13 04:27:03 | Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered |